and somebody in it should come back to DL1 on a Monday night so we can talk limited fork theory in person.
Yes to the tree, yes to bifurcating systems in the brain, yes to the tree with its forking systems above ground, below ground where, during examination of that subterranean bifurcating system, that underground location becomes the surface of that encounter --yes to some of the possible of forking a surface, altering a surface so that the interactions are shaped by using the fork itself in order to access, to examine --and yes to those intangibles falling through the tines, perhaps also influenced to some degree, on some scale by the shape of the negative space between the tines through which intangible particles fall
--and yet still limited on some scale, for the fork's inability to account for what fell through, inability to grasp what fell through so as to add those elements to frames of structures of existence
--there's a certain lack of completion, no matter how much is accessed, that can compromise various allnesses.
More on this is coming --except for those particles of more that fall through the tines
--and regarding what seems not to have fallen through, what seems to have been accessed, all of what is possible to accessed probably is not accessed, assuming that a particular fork could have a range of access that is less than all-inclusive.
Oh I am so delighted by this video, so eager to fork and discuss, fork and discuss, fork and discuss
--within the various prevailing (on some scale on some location for some duration of time) frame(s) of perception/access/possibility
1 comment:
Great video!
and somebody in it should come back to DL1 on a Monday night so we can talk limited fork theory in person.
Yes to the tree, yes to bifurcating systems in the brain, yes to the tree with its forking systems above ground, below ground where, during examination of that subterranean bifurcating system, that underground location becomes the surface of that encounter --yes to some of the possible of forking a surface, altering a surface so that the interactions are shaped by using the fork itself in order to access, to examine --and yes to those intangibles falling through the tines, perhaps also influenced to some degree, on some scale by the shape of the negative space between the tines through which intangible particles fall
--and yet still limited on some scale, for the fork's inability to account for what fell through, inability to grasp what fell through so as to add those elements to frames of structures of existence
--there's a certain lack of completion, no matter how much is accessed, that can compromise various allnesses.
More on this is coming --except for those particles of more that fall through the tines
--and regarding what seems not to have fallen through, what seems to have been accessed, all of what is possible to accessed probably is not accessed, assuming that a particular fork could have a range of access that is less than all-inclusive.
Oh I am so delighted by this video, so eager to fork and discuss, fork and discuss, fork and discuss
--within the various prevailing (on some scale on some location for some duration of time) frame(s) of perception/access/possibility
Post a Comment